RE: Does this knowledge frighten you, or excite you? by Physicalist

Physicalist — Fri, 23 Dec 2011 02:21:48 GMT

Anselm... sure seems well educated in Physics at a good university.

I read your piece. Are you trying to make one mindful of the item you are observing? Your many words direct one's thoughts to the present objects in front of you and direct or focus observation. It is like meditating on the objects in the present without mind wonderings. Does this process have practical benefits?

RE: Fletcher, no rational person can be reduced to ... by Reginald Harper

Reginald Harper — Sat, 07 Jan 2012 02:06:18 GMT

Fletcher, no rational person can be reduced to atheism or the games of atheists.

You are not the only one to dump long stacks of nasty-grams from Physicalist and his alternate personalities. I just forward them to AOL and they can keep an eye on Physicalist. In any event I don't fear Physicalist or his threats.

Get this one will you! He says that America will soon become a second edition of the Soviet Union so I had best start making contributions to him or else.

He may stand with his hand out asking for donations, but all he will get is a palm full of spit.

RE: Let's see now, what is standard atheist default 5 ... by fletcherba234

fletcherba234 — Fri, 30 Dec 2011 05:39:37 GMT

Let's see now, what is standard atheist default 5 of 11?

Oh, now I recall! The Bandwagon default:

5. "Bandwagon scheme." Atheists like to pretend that all the most admired persons on the planet are atheists when in fact the atheist cult is the most hated gang of misfits that ever went to prison -- and stayed there. Solution: show documentary evidence of atheist villains chosen at random, and show the full extent of their bloodshed.

Typical atheist defaults must always remain typical atheist defaults, so there is nothing interesting about atheists at all. Isn't it great to see that atheists are still consistently bioring?

RE: Phys is back to his bandwagon game. It didn't ... by Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 30 Dec 2011 04:44:01 GMT

Phys is back to his bandwagon game. It didn't work before and it doesn't work now. So much for losers who are so stupid that they must all play games like whores in a stinking low street whore house. Is that your yeast infection we all smell a block away, atheist whore?

Typical atheist con artists and their demands for money to join their cult.

Typical shabby liars are too stupid to think so they have to play games.

What a wimp! No wonder your whole useless life is just a stupid bitch psych game, loser!

RE: Fletcher--I think I did not say good bye to you ... by Physicalist

Physicalist — Fri, 30 Dec 2011 03:30:41 GMT

Fletcher--I think I did not say good bye to you. You commentary is self-evidently ignorant. Bringing up must be bad.

Yechiel--thanks for being the class act on this thread.

Shalom,

Physicalist

RE: Dear Fingerpointers; Take a look at this list ... by yechiel Shlipshon

yechiel Shlipshon — Fri, 30 Dec 2011 02:21:17 GMT

Dear Fingerpointers;

Take a look at this list. Then, point your fingers.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_atheists_

in_science_and_technology

Hohummm

Shalom. y'all;

Yechiel

RE: Dear Flettcherba; I sympathize with your ... by yechiel Shlipshon

yechiel Shlipshon — Fri, 30 Dec 2011 02:15:54 GMT

Dear Flettcherba;

I sympathize with your experience. I have had times when I had to go on faith. However, as you know, faith-without knowledge, is like a roast on the table uncooked. May look good, but not palitable. My faith is backed up with understanding. Maybe the reason we vowled at Sinai; "We shall do, and we shall learn."

The Athiest I have worked with are knowledgable persons. I cannot agree with their concept of the Divine, but I am not their judge. G-d is, and I learned a long time ago to let the person in that department (whichever department it is) handle his thing, I handle mine. If this is so on the Human level, is it not even more so on the Divine level? So let G-d and I do/learn.

To say x-people are so and so is in this catagory; the one being judgemental is trying to do G-d's work. This never works.

Shalom;

Yechiel

RE: I came here to clean up an insulting email from ... by fletcherba234

fletcherba234 — Thu, 29 Dec 2011 21:10:21 GMT

I came here to clean up an insulting email from Physicalist but I also see a few gems worth keeping. Atheists really are as witless as they seem, are they not? One need not sell me on faith as I have learned to feel what flight instruments cannot tell me and faith has proven the difference between life and death so many times I have trouble counting the incidents. However, these incidents are in my Fitness Reports.

Atheists are not the brightest people. It is probably best not to tell them what they are missing.

RE: That includes Top Renner-- I have no time for ignorant commentary. by Physicalist

Physicalist — Thu, 29 Dec 2011 15:31:35 GMT

That includes Top Renner-- I have no time for ignorant commentary.

RE: Reginald Harper, Physicalist will be following you ... by MGySgt Edward S. Renner USMC

MGySgt Edward S. Renner USMC — Thu, 29 Dec 2011 11:20:28 GMT

Reginald Harper, Physicalist will be following you around this site like a little puppy, constantly throwing atheist bigotry and lies at you (under 200+ screen names).

Atheists are absolutely militant and frantic that they didn't get their way so that is why they always play the very dullest of games. Typical, and as dull as atheism itself.

Talk about hypocritical. Well, that sums up atheism, does it not?

RE: Reginald--Just want you to know I will be ignoring you. I don't waste my time with foolish commentary. by Physicalist

Physicalist — Mon, 26 Dec 2011 03:14:59 GMT

Reginald--Just want you to know I will be ignoring you. I don't waste my time with foolish commentary.

RE: Anselmo, it is probably best to ignore Physicalist ... by Reginald Harper

Reginald Harper — Sun, 25 Dec 2011 20:08:20 GMT

Anselmo, it is probably best to ignore Physicalist. His "writings" indicate such a severe lack of understanding of science that there will be no hope to enlighten him.

We reserve the right to expel students who are disruptive, undisciplined, or inept. As Physicalist actually advocates for atheism, then he is suitable for expulsion from all higher learning on that basis. If there is anything beyond that for atheism, I have not seen it.

Atheists are among the least commendable persons on the planet. You would not be able to enlighten any atheist as atheists and roaches hide in the shadows for fear of discovery. I have tried on numerous occasions to reason with Physicalist. He has proved that atheists are as irrational as they are substandard.

RE: All you guys are complimenting me with comments ... by Physicalist

Physicalist — Sat, 24 Dec 2011 21:44:42 GMT

All you guys are complimenting me with comments that earn you a place on my hall of fame list of bigots. On retrospection I am sure each of you have one thing in common: Your fathers treated you with abuse or negligence. Have a happy Xmas Day wallowing in what sinners you are.

RE: Top Renner, I am already well aware the games and ... by The man without a name

The man without a name — Sat, 24 Dec 2011 18:54:26 GMT

Top Renner, I am already well aware the games and falsehoods of atheists. If anyone knows these failures inside out, it is I.

Frankly I thought to have a little fun at Physicalist's expense, discrediting atheism a little at a time until he must break from his unscientific way of life. It is never difficult to do so, but I admit that it is truly amusing to watch atheists squirm in discredit. It is inevitable.

Once atheists have come to grips with their anti-religious order's discredit then it is possible for them to become normal persons, but never before. In any case there is no cause to accept atheism as it is a truly extreme and fanatical cult. Their closed minds are only 2/3 functional anyway, so it is never difficult to discredit them.

Besides, it is our humanitarian duty to offer atheists something better, but if they turn it down that is their problem. I did my duty, Physicalist failed in his duty completely. Embarrassing for him, is it not?

It is appropriate to string these people along if only to prevent others being led to lives of utter immorality. Atheist propaganda is the most laughable that exists. I read a book called "Good without God" recently. It is an appeal to anti-religious genocide directly plagiarized from Mien Kampf. That renders atheism consistent with their neo-NAZI stereotype.

In any case, atheism is boring and bitter, just like the people attracted to it.

RE: Anselmo, be aware that Physicalist really is your ... by MGySgt Edward S. Renner USMC

MGySgt Edward S. Renner USMC — Sat, 24 Dec 2011 18:28:59 GMT

Anselmo, be aware that Physicalist really is your usual stereotypical atheist, but you have seen that apparently. There is absolutely no way this dim bulb is going to take you seriously because he is as deranged as Hitler, whom he worships as a god. That proves that all atheists are exactly the same, game for game and lie for lie.

It will be a waste of time trying to educate this clown.

RE: Can you prove your contention? Remember that ... by The man without a name

The man without a name — Sat, 24 Dec 2011 17:10:58 GMT

Can you prove your contention? Remember that atheists have committed propaganda on the Internet, have failed to meet any rational course of discussion, and guard their embarrassing lack of academics with fanatical zeal.

Until you cease your games, and part company with nineteenth century hoaxes, then you will remain in discredit.

RE: Anselmo-Hawkins and Susskind are atheists. So are ... by Physicalist

Physicalist — Sat, 24 Dec 2011 16:29:12 GMT

Anselmo-Hawkins and Susskind are atheists. So are most of the Noble science winners. Thanks for your offer to teach me science. What would be a good start?

RE: SoundaryaNayaki The teachers and academic ... by The man without a name

The man without a name — Sat, 24 Dec 2011 09:28:33 GMT

SoundaryaNayaki

The teachers and academic administrations crying that:

1. they are not able to make students correlate that is taught classroom with everyday objects.

Per contrare: all legitimate education goes from the easily demonstrated, to the practical, to the baseless. We then determine what is and what is not, disregarding authority entirely.

2. they are not able to reduce the size of school bags.

Per contrare: past secondary education, the institution is required to provide all facilities, equipment, and supplies, for the students. More importantly, these things must remain on campus as they are institutional property.

3. they are not able to reduce the educational cost.

Per contrare: we are well aware that post-secondary education is a privilege and has its costs. That is why we offer scholarships fopr promising students. Less promising students may not qualify for scholarships, but they will not be turned away unless there is clear cause to do so: a felony criminal record, for example.

4. they are not able reduce the psychological.

Per contrare: psychology is an essential part of any educational process, and is a major course of study in its own right.

Education consists of more than imparting information: the formation of sound policy, durable belief, interpersonal skill, teamwork, and scholastic discipline only a part of the overall equation. Hence leftists graduate virtually uneducated but we append that to their records. Employers take far greater note of these appendices than any other element of a student's record.

RE: Soundaryan, I read your paper. In the 26 ... by The man without a name

The man without a name — Sat, 24 Dec 2011 09:16:57 GMT

Soundaryan, I read your paper.

In the 26 pages I read, I saw nothing of merit. It appears more like a randomized policy paper based on inexperience. That leaves your contentions in discredit on the empirical basis. There is no case that could support your contentions.

I suggest that you enroll in a university that can bring you up to speed.

RE: Physicalist, I have read some of your other ... by The man without a name

The man without a name — Sat, 24 Dec 2011 09:06:57 GMT

Physicalist, I have read some of your other material. You seem, shall we say, a rather opinionated anti theist. I don't know that my degree or graduating university matters as much as your need to know something that you do not presently know. Realize that as we enter practical science you must be willing to discard your previous notions.

Know that atheism has been rejected from all of serious science for the last sixty years for very good reason. We have sequestered atheists away where they can do the least harm to science. Let them showboat with disproved theory all they will, they will not be invited to an engineering bullpen. We are a little more selective than that: you must know where form you speak in this profession.

I will be glad to discuss science with you but realize that your anti-religious bias makes it impossible for you to learn science.

You will find that religion is the first and longest ongoing scientific discipline. Time and atheism have been powerless to put its factual and historical basis into question.

I will discuss science with you as Stephen Hawking did with his atheist colleague Leonard Susskind. Realize also that Hawking disproved all of Susskind's biases with two very simple equations, but those chosen at random were among many thousands that settled the case against atheism admirably. Susskind walked away repeatedly with egg on his face and could not discredit Hawking for lack of any case to bring.

Please also realize that my degree does not come with such restrictions as "theoretical." Susskind suffers that limitation, but Hawking does not: only his worsening physical condition has kept Hawking in college, albeit in the Newtonian Chair until he retired.

It is clear that your mathematics are not up to par so until we can improve that we will discuss matters in generalities, although these generalities have the full support of scientific rigor and peer review.

If you are willing to face reality, I will begin working with you, but know that science always destroys atheism.

RE: I hope I understand you correctly. So you like ... by Physicalist

Physicalist — Fri, 23 Dec 2011 15:28:58 GMT

I hope I understand you correctly. So you like drilling students into thinking about everyday objects in multiple ways. That sure would enrich the firing capacity of the neurons and synapses in different ways. I wonder if this interesting concept has been researched for outcomes on a test for performance or imagination or creativity or whatever dimension you hypothesize.

RE: The teachers and academic administrations crying ... by SoundaryaNayaki

SoundaryaNayaki — Fri, 23 Dec 2011 06:10:07 GMT

The teachers and academic administrations crying that:

1. they are not able to make students correlate that is taught classroom with everyday objects.

2. they are not able to reduce the size of school bags.

3. they are not able to reduce the educational cost.

4. they are not able reduce the psychological.

In this regard, this document plays a vital role in instructing the students - something like a 'simple unified instructional system'